Music should be for free

June 30th, 2008 by admin

I read this post about how the musician Joss Stone supports file sharing and encourages people to download her music and listen to it. She argues that most musicians are brainwashed by the record labels and discourage their fans from downloading their music, “music is supposed to be shared” she said.

Thinking about it, she could not be more right, music is an emotional experience. It pumps you up,  brings you down, makes your remember or even inspires you. creating music is a talent given to a select few (If you don’t believe me you should listen to me singing in the shower)  and it is an amazing gift to be able to affect people in these ways. What’s interesting is that we are taught to think about monetizing every skill we have. If you can sing you should make money from it, if you can act you should make money too, if you can balance 200 books on your head, you definitely should not be left out. What happened to doing things for the fun of it. Any musician that is angry that people download his/her music for free has already failed my authenticity test. You should be happy you get to touch more souls, the same way Alicia Keys just inspired a woman to get back up on her feet and do something, 50 cent just helped a dude in the club get laid with his bump and grind jam. Your changing peoples lives here, musicians should be more concerned with the reach of their music rather than how much they are making from it.

So how will they eat? Most artists make their money from concerts, adverts and other sponsorship campaigns they have. If they spend money like Britney Spears their royalties from a multi platinum album will barely cover three months expenditure (How many people go multi platinum these days). So in the end free music = more exposure, more exposure = sold out/ more concerts = more money. It all evens out in the end or even does them better. With bands like Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails leading the movement towards free music its a matter of time before the whole music industry is re-evaluated.


Posted in thinking |

3 Responses

  1. CHU BOI Says:

    True. It would just suck for the people who are terrible on-stage. lol

    In a couple years they could even be making more money off music games. A couple bands (like Motley Crue)have released their new singles on Rock Band and iTunes simultaneously, and the RB sold more even though it was more expensive. People are willing to spend money for the game version since they can get more out of it. Sharing their songs for free would probably get more gamers, who spend tons of money on games ($1,000/yr on avg, it was just estimated. Sad, I know.) but rarely pay for music, to pay attention to the artist and then buy their songs as game DLC if they like what they head.

  2. xantos Says:

    true sturvings

    where are your archives?

  3. admin Says:

    I deleted the last blog and decided to start all over again

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.


copyright © 2oo7 by Thinking out loud |an Adimabua Ofunne Production